The Economist (Feb. 22, 2014) author of the “free exchange” column
writes about valuing nature.
“Establishing the value of these goods is tricky, but there are ways of
going about it. First, if an ecosystem
service has an output—such as pollinated crops—then it is often possible to
work out the value of the input. On that
basis, a study by academics at Cornell University estimated that bees and other
insects contributed $29 billion to the American economy in 2010. Second, if market prices are affected by
nature, a value can be derived from them.
Thus an apartment in New York with a view of Central Park is worth
considerably more than one without such a view. Third, people’s behavior—for instance the
costs they are prepared to bear to visit a national park—reveals the value that
they place on unpriced goods.”
“Some of the numbers derived from these methods are distinctly dodgy, but
conservationists argue, fairly reasonably, that it is better to have mediocre
estimates than none at all.”
No comments:
Post a Comment